Our AI identifies evidence that helps establish liability and damages under Oklahoma's modified comparative fault system (23 O.S. § 13). We highlight documentation supporting causation, injury severity, and damages, while helping you navigate the state's 50% bar rule. The system helps identify evidence that can maximize recovery while ensuring the plaintiff's fault does not exceed 50%, as Oklahoma bars recovery if the plaintiff's negligence is greater than the combined negligence of all defendants.

Our system identifies evidence that helps support the Certificate of Merit required under 12 O.S. § 19 for medical malpractice cases. While the Oklahoma Supreme Court has found this statute unconstitutional multiple times, many attorneys still obtain these affidavits to strengthen their cases. We highlight documentation addressing standard of care, alleged breach, and causation elements that strengthen your expert's opinion. Our analysis helps identify the specific medical evidence needed to support your expert's affidavit that there is a reasonable basis to believe that the defendant's care was negligent and caused harm.

Our AI analyzes medical records to identify key evidence supporting compensability and impairment under Oklahoma's Administrative Workers' Compensation Act. We highlight documentation that supports work-relatedness, causation analysis, and evidence relevant to Oklahoma's specific permanent partial disability rating system. The system helps identify evidence supporting temporary total disability, permanent partial disability, and permanent total disability designations under Oklahoma's workers' compensation laws, with special attention to the current AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment 6th Edition standards used in Oklahoma.

Our AI helps identify and categorize damages according to Oklahoma's statutory framework for medical malpractice cases. We separate economic damages (which are not capped) from non-economic damages (subject to Oklahoma's $350,000 cap under 23 O.S. § 61.2). The system highlights medical evidence supporting the full spectrum of damages while helping you navigate the cap limitations. We also identify evidence that might support exceptions to the cap for cases where the defendant's actions were in reckless disregard for the rights of others, grossly negligent, fraudulent, or intentional, which can remove the cap on non-economic damages.