Our AI identifies evidence that helps establish liability and damages under Tennessee's modified comparative fault system, established in McIntyre v. Balentine and codified in T.C.A. § 20-1-119. We highlight documentation supporting causation, injury severity, and damages, recognizing that in Tennessee, plaintiffs can recover damages only if they are 49% or less at fault (with recovery reduced by their proportion of fault). Our system helps identify evidence that can maximize recovery by establishing the defendant's proportion of fault as high as possible, while strategically minimizing the plaintiff's comparative negligence to stay under the critical 49% threshold.

Our system identifies evidence that helps support health care liability claims under Tennessee's Health Care Liability Act (T.C.A. § 29-26-101 et seq.). We help identify and organize evidence needed for the Certificate of Good Faith required by T.C.A. § 29-26-122, which must be filed with the complaint. Our analysis identifies medical documentation supporting the standard of care deviations needed for your expert's opinion and pre-suit notice requirements under T.C.A. § 29-26-121. We also assist with evidence supporting causation and damages, highlighting documentation that demonstrates how the alleged malpractice directly led to the plaintiff's injuries. Additionally, our system helps identify evidence relevant to Tennessee's statute of limitations (one year from discovery, but not more than three years from the date of injury) and evidence supporting damages within Tennessee's non-economic damages cap of $750,000 in most cases and $1 million for "catastrophic" injuries (T.C.A. § 29-39-102).

Our AI analyzes medical records to identify key evidence supporting compensability under Tennessee's Workers' Compensation Law (T.C.A. § 50-6-101 et seq.). We highlight documentation that supports the "primarily arising out of and in the course of employment" standard required under T.C.A. § 50-6-102(14), which means the employment contributed more than 50% in causing the injury, considering all causes. The system identifies evidence supporting this causation standard, which is typically required to be established by expert medical testimony to a reasonable degree of medical certainty. We also identify evidence relevant to the employee's maximum medical improvement, permanent impairment ratings under the AMA Guides 6th Edition (as required in Tennessee), and evidence supporting temporary and permanent disability benefits under Tennessee's workers' compensation system.

Yes, our AI helps identify and categorize evidence relevant to Tennessee's damage limitations and caps. For non-economic damages (pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, etc.), we organize evidence to support damages within Tennessee's cap of $750,000 in most cases and $1 million for "catastrophic" injuries as defined in T.C.A. § 29-39-102. For punitive damages, our system identifies evidence relevant to Tennessee's clear and convincing evidence standard and helps organize evidence relevant to the caps established in T.C.A. § 29-39-104, which limits punitive damages to the greater of twice the compensatory damages or $500,000. Economic damages (medical expenses, lost wages) are not subject to caps in Tennessee, and our system helps categorize and organize evidence supporting these damages to maximize recoverable compensation.