Our AI identifies evidence that helps establish liability and damages under Wisconsin's modified comparative negligence system (Wis. Stat. § 895.045). We highlight documentation supporting causation, injury severity, and damages, recognizing that in Wisconsin, plaintiffs can recover damages if they are 50% or less at fault (with recovery reduced by their proportion of fault). Our system helps identify evidence that can maximize recovery by establishing the defendant's proportion of fault as high as possible, while strategically minimizing the plaintiff's comparative negligence to stay under the critical 50% threshold. Additionally, Wisconsin follows joint and several liability principles in certain cases, particularly where a defendant is 51% or more at fault. In such cases, that defendant may be liable for the entire award, regardless of other defendants' contributions. Our analysis helps identify evidence to establish when a primary defendant meets this threshold for full liability, increasing potential recovery for your client.

Our system identifies evidence that helps support medical malpractice claims under Wisconsin's healthcare liability laws. Wisconsin requires a notice of claim against healthcare providers at least 90 days before filing a lawsuit (Wis. Stat. § 655.44). Our analysis helps identify and organize evidence needed for this notice and for potential mediation under Wisconsin's alternative dispute resolution system. Additionally, Wisconsin requires expert testimony in most medical malpractice cases to establish the standard of care and causation. Our AI helps identify medical documentation that can support expert opinions regarding whether a healthcare provider's actions deviated from the applicable standard of care and whether such deviations caused the plaintiff's injuries. We also assist with evidence supporting damages, highlighting documentation that demonstrates how the alleged malpractice directly led to the plaintiff's injuries. Our system helps identify evidence relevant to Wisconsin's statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims (generally three years from injury or one year from discovery, but not more than five years from the act) and evidence supporting damages while being mindful of Wisconsin's non-economic damages cap ($750,000 for medical malpractice cases under Wis. Stat. § 893.55).

Our AI analyzes medical records to identify key evidence supporting compensability under Wisconsin's Workers' Compensation Act (Wis. Stat. § 102.01 et seq.). We highlight documentation that supports the causal connection between work activities and the injury or illness. The system identifies evidence supporting that the injury "arises out of employment" and occurs "in the course of employment" as required under Wisconsin law. We also identify evidence relevant to disability determinations, including temporary total disability, temporary partial disability, and permanent partial disability (PPD), helping establish the nature and extent of work-related impairments according to Wisconsin's specific standards. Our analysis assists with documentation related to Wisconsin's requirements for PPD ratings, which are based on specific schedules for certain injuries and on more general assessments for others. Wisconsin utilizes a percentage-based rating system for permanent disabilities, and our system identifies medical evidence supporting these ratings. We also help identify evidence supporting claims for occupational diseases, which have specific evidentiary requirements in Wisconsin, particularly for conditions developed over time rather than from a single traumatic incident.

Yes, our AI helps identify and categorize evidence relevant to Wisconsin's damage limitations and caps. For medical malpractice cases, we organize evidence to support damages within Wisconsin's non-economic damages cap ($750,000 under Wis. Stat. § 893.55). For personal injury claims against government entities, we help organize evidence relevant to the Wisconsin Governmental Claims Act, which caps recovery against state employees and agencies. For wrongful death claims, our system identifies evidence relevant to Wisconsin's statutory caps on non-economic damages in wrongful death cases ($350,000 for deceased adults and $500,000 for deceased minors under Wis. Stat. § 895.04). Wisconsin generally prohibits punitive damages in medical malpractice cases, and our system helps ensure evidence is properly categorized to maximize recoverable damages within these constraints. Economic damages (medical expenses, lost wages) are not subject to caps in Wisconsin, and our system helps categorize and organize evidence supporting these damages to maximize recoverable compensation.

Our AI helps identify and organize evidence relevant to Wisconsin's collateral source rule, which prevents a defendant from introducing evidence that a plaintiff's damages were paid by other sources, such as health insurance. Wisconsin follows a modified collateral source rule that allows plaintiffs to recover the reasonable value of medical services rendered, regardless of amounts actually paid by insurers (often at negotiated lower rates). However, recent Wisconsin case law (particularly in Orlowski v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.) has modified this standard, making the amount actually paid relevant evidence of the reasonable value of services. Our system helps identify and organize medical billing evidence to support maximum recovery within this complex framework, highlighting evidence of both billed amounts and paid amounts while organizing documentation to take advantage of Wisconsin's collateral source protections. We also identify evidence relevant to Wisconsin's made-whole doctrine, which can affect subrogation rights of insurers and maximize your client's net recovery.