Our AI identifies evidence that helps establish liability and damages under Wyoming's modified comparative fault system (Wyo. Stat. § 1-1-109). We highlight documentation supporting causation, injury severity, and damages, recognizing that in Wyoming, plaintiffs can recover damages only if they are 49% or less at fault (with recovery reduced by their proportion of fault). Our system helps identify evidence that can maximize recovery by establishing the defendant's proportion of fault as high as possible, while strategically minimizing the plaintiff's comparative negligence to stay under the critical 49% threshold. The AI examines medical records for evidence supporting preexisting conditions versus new injuries, helping distinguish what damages can be attributed to the defendant's actions. This is particularly important in Wyoming where juries must allocate percentages of fault to all actors involved, including non-parties. Our analysis helps identify evidence supporting allocation of greater fault to defendants than to the plaintiff or any other parties, thus maximizing potential recovery within Wyoming's fault framework.

Our system identifies evidence that helps support medical malpractice claims under Wyoming's healthcare liability laws. Wyoming imposes a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases (Wyo. Stat. § 1-3-107), and our system helps organize evidence to maximize recovery within this constraint. Wyoming also requires that medical malpractice claims be brought within two years of the date of injury or within two years of when the injury was or should have been discovered, but no more than eight years after the act alleged to have caused the injury. Our AI helps identify evidence relevant to these timeframes to support timeliness arguments. Wyoming law also requires expert testimony to establish the standard of care and causation in most medical malpractice cases. Our analysis identifies medical documentation that can support expert opinions regarding whether a healthcare provider's actions deviated from the applicable standard of care and whether such deviations caused the plaintiff's injuries. Additionally, Wyoming has established the Wyoming Medical Review Panel (Wyo. Stat. § 9-2-1518 et seq.), which reviews claims before a lawsuit can be filed. Our system helps organize evidence that may be required for this panel review process, potentially facilitating early resolution of claims.

Our AI analyzes medical records to identify key evidence supporting compensability under Wyoming's Workers' Compensation Act (Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-101 et seq.). Wyoming operates under an exclusive remedy system where workers' compensation is generally the only recourse for employees injured on the job, with limited exceptions for intentional acts by the employer. Our system helps identify documentation that supports the essential elements of a Wyoming workers' compensation claim: that the injury arose out of and in the course of employment, and that there is a causal connection between the work conditions and the injury. The AI also identifies evidence relevant to Wyoming's specific categories of benefits, including temporary total disability, temporary partial disability, permanent partial impairment (PPI), and permanent total disability (PTD). Wyoming relies on the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment for determining impairment ratings, and our system helps identify medical evidence that supports appropriate ratings under these guidelines. Additionally, for occupational disease claims, we help identify evidence supporting the required showing that the disease was caused by workplace conditions and not by factors outside employment.

Yes, our AI helps identify and organize evidence relevant to Wyoming's governmental immunity laws, which are particularly important in cases involving public healthcare facilities or government employees. The Wyoming Governmental Claims Act (Wyo. Stat. § 1-39-101 et seq.) provides immunity to governmental entities and public employees except in specific circumstances where immunity has been waived. Our system helps identify evidence that may support claims falling within these waivers, such as for the negligent operation of public hospitals or healthcare facilities, which is a specific waiver under the Act. We also help organize evidence relevant to the notice requirements under the Act, which mandate that a claim against a governmental entity must be presented within two years of the alleged act or omission. The Act also limits recovery against governmental entities to $250,000 per claimant and $500,000 per occurrence, and our system helps categorize evidence to maximize recovery within these statutory constraints. This is particularly important in rural Wyoming, where many healthcare facilities are county-owned or otherwise subject to governmental immunity provisions.

Our AI is specifically trained to identify and highlight evidence that meets Wyoming's unique documentation requirements across various practice areas. In personal injury cases, Wyoming courts require clear documentation of both economic and non-economic damages. Our system helps organize medical records to clearly demonstrate the connection between the injury mechanism and the resulting damages, which is especially important under Wyoming's "reasonable certainty" standard for proving damages. For medical malpractice cases, we help identify evidence that can establish the relevant standard of care, which in Wyoming may be influenced by the rural nature of much of the state's healthcare delivery. Wyoming recognizes that the standard of care may vary based on locality and available resources, and our system helps identify evidence that addresses these Wyoming-specific standards. In workers' compensation cases, we help identify evidence supporting the "injury" definition under Wyoming law, which requires a "harmful change in the human organism." This is particularly important for establishing compensability for conditions that develop over time rather than from a single traumatic event. Our analysis also assists with documenting evidence supporting claims for mileage reimbursement for travel to medical appointments, which can be significant in Wyoming's rural landscape where patients often travel substantial distances for specialized care.