Our AI identifies evidence that can impact liability allocation under Kentucky's pure comparative fault system. Unlike states with modified comparative fault, Kentucky allows plaintiffs to recover damages even when they are 99% at fault (though reduced by their percentage of fault). Our system prioritizes finding evidence that minimizes plaintiff's fault while maximizing the defendant's share of liability to optimize recovery.

Our system identifies evidence that helps support your certificate of merit requirements under KRS 411.167 for Kentucky medical malpractice cases. We highlight documentation addressing standard of care, alleged breach, and causation elements that strengthen your expert consultation certification, ensuring your case meets Kentucky's threshold requirements to proceed.

Our AI analyzes medical records to identify key evidence supporting compensability and impairment under Kentucky's workers' compensation system. We highlight documentation that supports work-relatedness, maximum medical improvement determinations, and evidence relevant to Kentucky's use of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 5th Edition, which is mandated by statute for impairment ratings.

Our AI helps identify key dates within medical records relevant to Kentucky's statute of limitations, which includes a discovery rule for medical malpractice cases. The system flags evidence of when injuries were discovered or reasonably should have been discovered, which is critical for cases where there was a delay in discovering the injury or malpractice. This helps ensure compliance with Kentucky's one-year statute of limitations while preserving arguments under the discovery rule.